Polar Coalitions in a Legislative Bargaining Game

نویسنده

  • A. Joseph Guse
چکیده

Abstract. This paper considers an alternating offer legislative bargaining game with heterogeneous ideological preferences modeled as ideal points on an interval. The main contribution is a framework for measuring two forces that typically give proposers incentive to form coalitions out of either the left or right halves of the ideological spectrum “polar coalitions”. For a benchmark model with a particular payoff specification and two-period bargaining horizon, I show that the unique subgame perfect equilibrium entails only polar coalition formation independent of the ideal point distribution. This leads to the counterintuitive result that groups out of the center cannot form coalitions in equilibrium no matter how similar are their preferences. I then relax the assumptions of the benchmark model and derive a sufficient condition for polar coalition formation. I also present numerical evidence from the infinite horizon setting. Journal of Economic Literature Classification Code: D72.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Dynamic Coalitions

Policy-making is a dynamic process in which policies can be changed in each period but continue in the absence of new legislation. We study a dynamic legislative bargaining game with an endogenous status quo where in each period a dollar is allocated with a proposal voted against the allocation in the previous period. We characterize for any initial status quo a class of simple Markov perfect e...

متن کامل

Bargaining in Legislatures: An Experimental Investigation of Open versus Closed Amendment Rules

We investigate the differential effects of open versus closed amendment rules within the framework of a distributive model of legislative bargaining. The data show that there are longer delays in distributing beneÞts and a more egalitarian distribution of beneÞts under the open amendment rule, the proposer gets a larger share of the beneÞts than coalition members under both rules, and play conv...

متن کامل

Measuring the efficiency of Iranian electricity distribution companies, a combined approach to bargaining game with DEA

 Many models have been proposed for measuring performance of business agencies up to now. The goal of this research is providing a new approach for evaluation and measurement of efficiencies of national power distribution companies. This approach is provided as a combination of Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Game Theory for evaluation of decision-making units by a large scale of actions. I...

متن کامل

Valuations and Dynamics of Negotiations

This paper analyzes three-party negotiations in the presence of externalities, deriving a close form solution for the stationary subgame perfect Nash equilibrium of a standard non-cooperative bargaining model. Players’ values are monotonically increasing (or decreasing) in the amount of negative (or positive) externalities that they impose on others. Moreover, players’ values are continuous and...

متن کامل

Legislative bargaining with teams

We experimentally investigate the Baron-Ferejohn (1989) model of legislative bargaining with two player teams versus individuals. Teams pass minimum winning coalitions (MECs) significantly more often than individuals, meeting or beating the demanding truth wins norm. Teams have significantly more proposer power, and come significantly closer to the SSPE prediction. This results from proposers c...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2009